2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (154 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 739 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (207 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2005 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Tribute | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | Tribute | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1479 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1810 mm |
