2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C30. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 116 kg more than 2008 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (207 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo C30. (165 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Tribute | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Tribute | C30 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1327 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |
