2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (414 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 202 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (207 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Tribute | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Tribute | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |