2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2013 GMC Sierra. (192 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2013 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Sierra weights approximately 516 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Sierra (353 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (262 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Tribute | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Mazda | GMC |
Model | Tribute | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 262 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1507 kg | 2023 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2031 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1869 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 98 L |