2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 886 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | MCC | Volvo |
| Model | Crossblade | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2850 mm |
