2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1953 Renault Juva
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 747 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Renault Juva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1953 Renault Juva. (20 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1953 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Renault Juva weights approximately 204 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Renault Juva. (45 Nm). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Renault Juva.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1953 Renault Juva | |
| Make | MCC | Renault |
| Model | Crossblade | Juva |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 20 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 948 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2360 mm |
