2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 906 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | MCC | Talbot |
| Model | Crossblade | Baby |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2693 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3130 mm |
