2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1958 Suzuki Light
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1958 Suzuki Light. (14 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1958 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 204 kg more than 1958 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1958 Suzuki Light | |
| Make | MCC | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossblade | Light |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 359 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 14 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
