2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1960 Porsche 356
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Porsche 356 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Porsche 356 (135 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Porsche 356 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Porsche 356 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1960 Porsche 356 | |
| Make | MCC | Porsche |
| Model | Crossblade | 356 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 135 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 786 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2110 mm |
