2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1961 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 341 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1961 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1961 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Crossblade | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2540 mm |
