2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1962 Renault Caravelle
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault Caravelle would be higher. At 845 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Renault Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1962 Renault Caravelle. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Renault Caravelle weights approximately 18 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Renault Caravelle. (59 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Renault Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 1962 Renault Caravelle | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Crossblade | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 59 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2270 mm |