2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1962 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Toyota Crown (80 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Crown weights approximately 511 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1962 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1962 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Crossblade | Crown |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2700 mm |
