2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1967 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 1,078 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Kadett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1967 Opel Kadett. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Kadett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Opel Kadett weights approximately 26 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Kadett. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1967 Opel Kadett | |
| Make | MCC | Opel |
| Model | Crossblade | Kadett |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1078 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2420 mm |
