2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1970 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 546 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1970 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Crossblade | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2700 mm |
