2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1971 Triumph 1500
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Triumph 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 1500. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Triumph 1500 weights approximately 221 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Triumph 1500 (110 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1971 Triumph 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1971 Triumph 1500 | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Crossblade | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2460 mm |
