2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Datsun 240Z (151 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 324 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1973 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade. 1973 Datsun 240Z has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Datsun 240Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: