2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1974 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Zastava 2101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 2101. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 216 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1974 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | MCC | Zastava |
| Model | Crossblade | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2430 mm |
