2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 405 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 1978 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | MCC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Crossblade | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1149 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2670 mm |