2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1980 Suzuki Jimny
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Jimny. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Jimny would be higher. At 970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Suzuki Jimny is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki Jimny. (48 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki Jimny. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Suzuki Jimny weights approximately 61 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1980 Suzuki Jimny is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki Jimny will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki Jimny. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki Jimny.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1980 Suzuki Jimny | |
| Make | MCC | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossblade | Jimny |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 48 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
