2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 736 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | MCC | Mercury |
Model | Crossblade | Cougar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2650 mm |