2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1983 Suzuki Alto

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 1983 Suzuki Alto is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1983 Suzuki Alto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 134 kg more than 1983 Suzuki Alto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Suzuki Alto.

Compare all specifications: