2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1984 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 44 kg more than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications: