2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1992 Volvo 245
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 245 (116 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 245 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Volvo 245 (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1992 Volvo 245 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1992 Volvo 245 | |
| Make | MCC | Volvo |
| Model | Crossblade | 245 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 116 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2660 mm |
