2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1995 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Cima weights approximately 786 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 1995 Nissan Cima | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Crossblade | Cima |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |