2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1995 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 2,324 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Seat Toledo weights approximately 311 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Seat Toledo (205 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1995 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 1995 Seat Toledo | |
Make | MCC | Seat |
Model | Crossblade | Toledo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1055 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2480 mm |