2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1998 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 1998 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | MCC | SsangYong |
| Model | Crossblade | Musso |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1740 mm |
