2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 1999 Nissan President

To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan President. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan President would be higher. At 4,494 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan President is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan President (267 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan President should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan President weights approximately 1146 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan President (394 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan President will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade. 1999 Nissan President has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan President will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: