2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 541 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan HyperMini (130 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan HyperMini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade. 2001 Nissan HyperMini has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan HyperMini will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Crossblade | HyperMini |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 1900 mm |