2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Silverpulse would be higher. At 699 cc (2 cylinders), 2004 MCC Silverpulse is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
| Make | MCC | MCC |
| Model | Crossblade | Silverpulse |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
