2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (216 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 786 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (300 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 2004 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | MCC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Crossblade | C |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 216 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2970 mm |
