2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 477 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 506 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 648 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | MCC | Pagani |
Model | Crossblade | Zonda |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 547 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 750 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2730 mm |