2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 Kia Cerato

To start off, both 2005 MCC Crossblade and 2005 Kia Cerato were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Cerato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Cerato (101 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Cerato weights approximately 451 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Cerato (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Cerato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade. 2005 Kia Cerato has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Kia Cerato will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: