2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 791 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | MCC | Rover |
Model | Crossblade | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2750 mm |