2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP) has 1199 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 506 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | MCC | SSC |
| Model | Crossblade | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 1269 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1090 mm |
