2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | MCC | Aston Martin |
Model | Crossblade | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |