2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Fluence weights approximately 481 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Crossblade | Fluence |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2702 mm |