2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2012 Audi S3
To start off, 2012 Audi S3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S3 (261 HP) has 191 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2012 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2012 Audi S3 | |
Make | MCC | Audi |
Model | Crossblade | S3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |