2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2012 BMW X1
To start off, 2012 BMW X1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW X1 has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW X1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 2012 BMW X1 | |
| Make | MCC | BMW |
| Model | Crossblade | X1 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4454 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1798 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1545 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2760 mm |
