2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP) has 206 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lotus Evora (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2012 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | MCC | Lotus |
Model | Crossblade | Evora |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 276 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2576 mm |