2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP) has 232 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Crossblade | 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | MCC | SsangYong |
Model | Crossblade | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3270 mm |