2005 MCC Crossblade vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (266 HP) has 196 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 1151 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 MCC Crossblade | 2013 Lexus RX | |
| Make | MCC | Lexus |
| Model | Crossblade | RX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2740 mm |
