2005 MCC ForTwo vs. 1997 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 MCC ForTwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 400 (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2005 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 400 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1997 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC ForTwo | 1997 Rover 400 | |
Make | MCC | Rover |
Model | ForTwo | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2560 mm |