2005 MCC Smart vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower

To start off, 2005 MCC Smart is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Smart (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 224 kg more than 2005 MCC Smart.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 MCC Smart (96 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.

Compare all specifications:

2005 MCC Smart 1953 Triumph Mayflower
Make MCC Triumph
Model Smart Mayflower
Year Released 2005 1953
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 698 cc 1247 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 60 HP 37 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 96 Nm 79 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 730 kg 954 kg
Vehicle Length 3440 mm 3920 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1200 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2110 mm