2005 MCC Smart vs. 1998 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2005 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2005 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercury Villager weights approximately 980 kg more than 2005 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 MCC Smart | 1998 Mercury Villager | |
Make | MCC | Mercury |
Model | Smart | Villager |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2860 mm |