2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 383 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept. (300 Nm). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz Bionic Car Concept | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
| Model | Bionic Car Concept | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 87 L |
