2005 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 325 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | C | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2148 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1195 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
