2005 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1978 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (160 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 618 kg more than 1978 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (240 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz C | 1978 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | C | 1300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 2685 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2430 mm |