2005 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 910 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (240 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | C | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2685 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2160 mm |
