2005 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 422 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz C | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | C | 132 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1098 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2560 mm |