2005 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (189 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 284 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (260 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercedes-Benz C | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | C | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1803 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1621 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 53 L |